Saturday, January 9, 2010

US combat plane stationed at the military base in Curaçao violated Venezuelan airspace yesterday




Curaçao: The Third Frontier of the United States
US combat plane stationed at the military base in Curaçao violated Venezuelan airspace yesterday

By Eva Golinger

Caracas, January 9, 2009 - Yesterday’s violation of Venezuelan airspace by a P-3 US military combat plane is another example of the escalation in provocations against Venezuela and evidence of the danger US military presence in the region represents. During a live television broadcast on the evening of January 8, President Hugo Chávez revealed that at approximately 12:55pm earlier that day, a US P3 combat plane took off from the air base in neighboring Curaçao and entered Venezuelan airspace during a 15-minute period. Two Venezuelan F-16 planes intercepted the foreign military aircraft, prepared to escort it outside Venezuelan territory. “When the F-16 planes attempted communication with the US aircraft, it immediately took off towards the north, but later it returned”, announced President Chávez. He said that at 1:37pm Venezuelan time, the combat plane returned and flew for about 19 minutes inside Venezuelan territory. “It was escorted out and pressured by our F-16s, we didn’t have to bring in the Sukhois”, added Chávez.

The Pentagon has denied violation of Venezuelan airspace, yet the Venezuelan military has video and photographic images of the US combat plane incursion yesterday.

Just days earlier, Venezuela’s Vice-President Ramón Carrizalez had publicly denounced the intromission of a US military plane also originating from the air base in Curaçao during 2009. The governments of Washington and Holland denied the violation, yet Carrizalez revealed an audio recording between the Venezuelan airport control tower and the US pilot while inside Venezuelan airspace. The pilot stated clearly that he was flying a US Navy military plane stationed at the base in Curaçao. He claimed ignorance as to the violation of Venezuelan territory, stating he was “unaware” he had entered an unauthorized zone. But the US military plane hadn’t just merely crossed a border that some might argue is difficult to visualize, rather the pilot had flown over a strategic Venezuelan military base on La Orchila, a small island off Venezuela’s northern coast, clearly well inside Venezuelan territory. This was not an isolated incident.

Since 2008, Washington has been increasing its military and intelligence presence on the small Dutch island of Curaçao, where it maintains a Forward Operating Location (FOL) since 1999. The original contract between Holland and Washington stipulated use of Curaçao for counter-narcotics operations. But since September 11, 2001, Washington began using its military installations around the world to combat “terrorist threats” and threats against US interests, and in some cases, such as in Curaçao and Aruba, violating the terms of previous military agreements that only authorized counter-narcotics or humanitarian missions.

By 2006, US operations from Curaçao were not just US Air Force counter-narcotics missions, but a clear presence of US Navy, Marines, Army, Special Forces and CIA had taken over the tiny Caribbean island. Together, the US military and intelligence community components were conducting joint exercises and operations to combat a “potencial threat in the region”. At the same time, the Bush Administration was trying to brand Venezuela as a state sponsor of terrorism, despite the lack of any evidence to back such a dangerous accusation.

The arrival of US aircraft carriers, war ships, combat planes, Black Hawk helicopters, nuclear submarines, and thousands of troops to the waters of Curaçao to participate in “joint exercises” caused alarm in the region. The Commander of the U.S.S. Stout, one of the war ships that docked in Willemstad during Spring 2006, declared to the Curaçao press on April 11, 2006, “…we are the most powerful Naval force in the world and the United States will defend its friends in the region under all circumstances.” Commander Thomas K. Kiss also exclaimed that his powerful ship represented “…a formidable presence to defend US interests in the region.”

That was in 2006. In 2008, the stakes intensified. Washington formally attempted to place Venezuela on the terrorism list, though Congress didn’t approve the request because of oil dependence. But in July 2008, the US Naval Fourth Fleet was reactivated after almost 60 years, to “demonstrate US power and force in the region”. In 2009, a military agreement between Colombia and Washington was sealed, allowing the Pentagon to occupy and use seven military bases in Colombian territory and any civilian installation necessary. US Air Force documents justifying the agreement and budget requests to improve Colombian military installations underlined the necessity to combat “…the constant threat of …anti-US governments in the region” and to engage in Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaisance missions, as well as to improve the US armed forces’ capacity to execute “Expeditionary Warfare” in the region.

In December 2009, President Chávez denounced the detection of a US drone plane that had violated Venezuelan territory from Colombia.

A Department of State publication from 2006 classified the Dutch islands of Aruba, Bonaire and Curaçao as the “The Third Frontier of the United States”, considering the Caribbean colonies part of the “geopolitical border of the United States”. In reaction to the growing US military presence on Curaçao, a local journalist commented, upon visiting one of the US war ships, “After leaving the war ship, we had the sensation that all of a sudden, we are now very important…”

6 comments:

crowth said...

To be absolutely accurate, Washington did not deny the May 2009 airspace violation. This Reuters report from May 19th 2009 confirms that the Pentagon acknowledged that a Navy aircraft strayed into Venezuelan airspace:

http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1955667220080520

I enjoy your writing and don't disagree with your overall narrative but the audio Carrizalez provided doesn't catch Washington in a lie as you suggest.

Eva Golinger said...

The Pentagon did just yesterday deny US violation of Venezuelan airspace. And yes, both Holland and Washington did deny previously intentional violation of Venezuelan airspace, ever...

Metro said...

To Richard Crowther, the article you posted is NOT from 2009 but from year 2008 my friend.

"Mon May 19, 2008 8:35pm EDT"

Metro said...

Dear Eva Golinger,

Great material! Thanks for keeping us informed.

Neo said...

Estimada Eva! He visto la excelente entrevista concedida a Vanesa Davies en dando y dando sobre como organisaciones americanas de "desarrollo" financian y apoyan de diferentes formas a grupusculos disidentes, especialmente estudiantiles en Venezuela. Ud nombre la cifra de 500 organisaciones que reciben este apoyo financiero. Creo que seria muy importante dar a conocer que organisaciones son. Segun lo que Ud misma dijo en ese programa los documentos que soltaron las autoridades americanas tacharon los nombres de esas organisaciones, inclumpliendo incluso con las leyes americanas al respecto. El argumento que dieron fue que habia que protejer a esas entidades de posibles persecuciones. Nosotros sabemos que en Venezuela de hoy todo el mundo se puede pronunciar y manifestarse sobre cualquier pregunta sin miedo a ser perseguido. Por lo que este argumento es totalmente invalido y solo forma parte de la guerra desinformatica en contra del gobierno nacional bolivariano. Otra cosa es que instituciones y organisaciones venezolanas reciban las directrices y financiamiento de potencias extranjeras, que por supuesto apoyan agendas que esten en su propio interes. Eso es normal y por lo mismo hasta en los mismos EEUU esta prohibido recibir fondos del extranjero para hacer campañas politicas, la llamada ley contra la sedicion. Seria muy bueno que esos nombres aparecieran al publico, que los venezolanos sepan quien financia a quien y quienes son los financieros. Bueno, eso era lo que queria decirte. Saludos y felicitaciones por el trabajo magnifico, enorme e importante que llevas a cabo. Tu integridad como periodista e investigadora ya ha plasmado tu nombre entre los grandes con dignidad. Un abrazo!

crowth said...

Apologies all round for my mistake regarding the dating of the Reuters report. That was a stupid oversight on my part. Thanks to Metro for pointing it out.